2009 One Of the Safest Years On Record For Bikers

Written by Boston Biker on Sep 29

2009 was almost the safest year on record if you drove, cycles, or walked in America, at least that is what the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) numbers show.

In 2009, 33,808 people died in motor vehicle traffic crashes in the United States – the lowest number of deaths since 1950 (33,186 fatalities in 1950). This was a 9.7-percent decline in the number of people killed, from 37,423 in 2008 to 33,808, according to NHTSA’s 2009 Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) (see Figure 1). Fatalities declined among all categories of vehicle occupants and non-occupants as shown in Table 1 below. Motorcyclist fatalities broke the continuous 11-year increase with a large decline of 850 fatalities (24% of the total decline of 3,615). Motorcyclist fatalities now account for 13 percent of total fatalities. Passenger car occupant fatalities declined for the seventh consecutive year, and are at their lowest level since NHTSA began collecting fatality crash data in 1975. Light-truck occupant fatalities dropped for the fourth consecutive year, and are at their lowest level since 1997. The largest percentage reduction of people killed was among large truck occupants (26%) compared to any other vehicle category, followed by motorcyclists with a 16-percent reduction.

There was also a reduction in Pedestrian and Cyclists Fatalities.

You can read the full report here (pdf)

Alcohol still plays a large part in crashes and fatalities, but overall the roads are safer than they have ever been, so go ride your bike!


submit 2009 One Of the Safest Years On Record For Bikers to reddit.com Add to Reddit.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in advocacy, news | 1 Comment »


One Response to “2009 One Of the Safest Years On Record For Bikers”

  1. By Mike on Sep 29, 2010 | Reply

    Does this really prove that the roads are truly safer? And if so, why? I wonder how much of an impact weather and the economy play into a reduction like this.

    Where the economy is concerned, if you have significantly more people out of work, wouldn’t it stand to reason that we have less people traveling, or having the money to travel.. I would think that would impact the fatality rate to some degree.

Post a Comment