<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Filipov Of The Boston Globe Responds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bostonbiker.org/2009/08/10/david-filipov-of-the-boston-globe-responds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bostonbiker.org/2009/08/10/david-filipov-of-the-boston-globe-responds/</link>
	<description>A community for cyclists in Boston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:45:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boston Biker &#187; Blog Archive &#187; David Filipov Covers Pedestrians</title>
		<link>http://bostonbiker.org/2009/08/10/david-filipov-of-the-boston-globe-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>Boston Biker &#187; Blog Archive &#187; David Filipov Covers Pedestrians</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonbiker.org/?p=1194#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>[...] is trying to prove me wrong, and I couldn&#8217;t be happier. I am glad he followed through on his insinuation that he would cover other road users groups. His recent article about pedestrians highlights the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is trying to prove me wrong, and I couldn&#8217;t be happier. I am glad he followed through on his insinuation that he would cover other road users groups. His recent article about pedestrians highlights the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://bostonbiker.org/2009/08/10/david-filipov-of-the-boston-globe-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-1156</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonbiker.org/?p=1194#comment-1156</guid>
		<description>Dang, and now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/08/13/the_cure_for_road_rage_bike_laws/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, and now <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/08/13/the_cure_for_road_rage_bike_laws/" rel="nofollow">this</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callie Durbrow</title>
		<link>http://bostonbiker.org/2009/08/10/david-filipov-of-the-boston-globe-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>Callie Durbrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonbiker.org/?p=1194#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>Interesting article and also an interesting response. I agree with Dan though, that people need to see the world and understand that other people do in fact live in it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article and also an interesting response. I agree with Dan though, that people need to see the world and understand that other people do in fact live in it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte Burger</title>
		<link>http://bostonbiker.org/2009/08/10/david-filipov-of-the-boston-globe-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte Burger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonbiker.org/?p=1194#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>With all due respect- to try and decipher between the intent of the article and what is written on the page-- is splitting hairs. The tone of the article is inflammatory, biased, and negative- and thus the reaction it insights is the same in those who read- whether bikers or drivers- but for very different reasons. 

In reality- the article is incredibly irresponsible for the reasons pointed out by the main Boston Biker response- namely the threat posed to cyclists (and others) by drivers of 4000+ pd. vehicles. 

I have had on several occasions- in Boston and other cities been threatened by drivers- verbally (literally &quot;I should run you over&quot;) and in a couple of cases- physically- as they &quot;pretended&quot; to accelerate into me- and stopped at the last moment- with a level of glee akin to a psychopath. 

The Filipov article is fodder for these same sorts of people. Again, instead of providing a coherent, balanced look at the road situation- it provides those with a bone to pick about cyclists- even more reason to act, and do as they please- because &quot;all those cyclist are a bunch of unruly bastards anyway&quot;- why not cut them off- why not yell at them? 

To put forth that the &quot;intent&quot; of the article was not so- without consideration of the environment in which bikers regularly find themselves on the streets of Boston and other cities is negligent. But I don&#039;t suppose Mr. Filipov rides a bike (though I really don&#039;t know). 

Further- perhaps Filipov should have taken some of the &quot;reporting&quot;  he did on car behavior and integrated it with what he found regarding bicycle behavior to provide a better analysis. Posting a link on a biker blog- likely only read by bikers- about the supposed balanced approach being taken by the author is way too little- but hopefully not too late. 

Perhaps Filipov will consider writing another article with a little bit more research on his part regarding the positive public health, economic, and environmental implications of biking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect- to try and decipher between the intent of the article and what is written on the page&#8211; is splitting hairs. The tone of the article is inflammatory, biased, and negative- and thus the reaction it insights is the same in those who read- whether bikers or drivers- but for very different reasons. </p>
<p>In reality- the article is incredibly irresponsible for the reasons pointed out by the main Boston Biker response- namely the threat posed to cyclists (and others) by drivers of 4000+ pd. vehicles. </p>
<p>I have had on several occasions- in Boston and other cities been threatened by drivers- verbally (literally &#8220;I should run you over&#8221;) and in a couple of cases- physically- as they &#8220;pretended&#8221; to accelerate into me- and stopped at the last moment- with a level of glee akin to a psychopath. </p>
<p>The Filipov article is fodder for these same sorts of people. Again, instead of providing a coherent, balanced look at the road situation- it provides those with a bone to pick about cyclists- even more reason to act, and do as they please- because &#8220;all those cyclist are a bunch of unruly bastards anyway&#8221;- why not cut them off- why not yell at them? </p>
<p>To put forth that the &#8220;intent&#8221; of the article was not so- without consideration of the environment in which bikers regularly find themselves on the streets of Boston and other cities is negligent. But I don&#8217;t suppose Mr. Filipov rides a bike (though I really don&#8217;t know). </p>
<p>Further- perhaps Filipov should have taken some of the &#8220;reporting&#8221;  he did on car behavior and integrated it with what he found regarding bicycle behavior to provide a better analysis. Posting a link on a biker blog- likely only read by bikers- about the supposed balanced approach being taken by the author is way too little- but hopefully not too late. </p>
<p>Perhaps Filipov will consider writing another article with a little bit more research on his part regarding the positive public health, economic, and environmental implications of biking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dot Bike &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Boston Biking in the News</title>
		<link>http://bostonbiker.org/2009/08/10/david-filipov-of-the-boston-globe-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot Bike &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Boston Biking in the News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonbiker.org/?p=1194#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>[...] and in various blogs including an interesting back and forth between our favorite web host/blogger BostonBiker and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and in various blogs including an interesting back and forth between our favorite web host/blogger BostonBiker and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Pugatch</title>
		<link>http://bostonbiker.org/2009/08/10/david-filipov-of-the-boston-globe-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Pugatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonbiker.org/?p=1194#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>David,

Let&#039;s call a spade a spade here okay?

The problem is everyone in our society is so self focused and unaware of how their actions affect others.

Yes I am a cyclist. A messenger at that! I spend more time in traffic in one day then you do in a month. I&#039;ve seen it all, from cars double parked in bike lanes to cyclists running red lights to cops NOT doing anything when someone gets knocked off their bike when a car hits it.

Unfortunately our lovely law enforcement is not something we can trust. For some reason they don&#039;t ticket people for parking in bike lanes or double parked in general. In fact when there&#039;s signs that say they will tow you, they don&#039;t tow you or ticket you. How do I know this? I see 5-10 cars in a long row all the time committing these infractions at the same time.

I call the local police and complain about people parked in the bike lane and they show up and tell them to move. I thought it was a $100 fine? Apparently that was just show for the papers.

One of the most major problems is cell phones and radios. People listen to music so loud they can&#039;t hear others honk at them, police/fire/ambulance sirens/or the screams of an old lady they just hit. Cell phones and driving need to be banned, not a here&#039;s a ticket. How about you lose you license for 6 months and have to take driver&#039;s ed again and pay fines. I&#039;ve been hit by drivers on their cell phones who had NO IDEA they hit me because they were too busy chatting. I&#039;ve had people run red lights and almost hit me (while I&#039;m in a car) because they were too busy on their phones. I&#039;ve had cars hit me from behind while I&#039;m stopped at a red light. People don&#039;t pay attention. Its sad.

Fines that will hurt people&#039;s pockets like $500. Tow more, ticket less, or do both. Suspend licenses. This isn&#039;t a car vs. bike issue. This is a horrific motorist behavior/mentality issue.

And there was no need to end your email to Shane with a snarky comment, it just makes you look like a jerk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s call a spade a spade here okay?</p>
<p>The problem is everyone in our society is so self focused and unaware of how their actions affect others.</p>
<p>Yes I am a cyclist. A messenger at that! I spend more time in traffic in one day then you do in a month. I&#8217;ve seen it all, from cars double parked in bike lanes to cyclists running red lights to cops NOT doing anything when someone gets knocked off their bike when a car hits it.</p>
<p>Unfortunately our lovely law enforcement is not something we can trust. For some reason they don&#8217;t ticket people for parking in bike lanes or double parked in general. In fact when there&#8217;s signs that say they will tow you, they don&#8217;t tow you or ticket you. How do I know this? I see 5-10 cars in a long row all the time committing these infractions at the same time.</p>
<p>I call the local police and complain about people parked in the bike lane and they show up and tell them to move. I thought it was a $100 fine? Apparently that was just show for the papers.</p>
<p>One of the most major problems is cell phones and radios. People listen to music so loud they can&#8217;t hear others honk at them, police/fire/ambulance sirens/or the screams of an old lady they just hit. Cell phones and driving need to be banned, not a here&#8217;s a ticket. How about you lose you license for 6 months and have to take driver&#8217;s ed again and pay fines. I&#8217;ve been hit by drivers on their cell phones who had NO IDEA they hit me because they were too busy chatting. I&#8217;ve had people run red lights and almost hit me (while I&#8217;m in a car) because they were too busy on their phones. I&#8217;ve had cars hit me from behind while I&#8217;m stopped at a red light. People don&#8217;t pay attention. Its sad.</p>
<p>Fines that will hurt people&#8217;s pockets like $500. Tow more, ticket less, or do both. Suspend licenses. This isn&#8217;t a car vs. bike issue. This is a horrific motorist behavior/mentality issue.</p>
<p>And there was no need to end your email to Shane with a snarky comment, it just makes you look like a jerk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://bostonbiker.org/2009/08/10/david-filipov-of-the-boston-globe-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonbiker.org/?p=1194#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>Someone should point out to David Filipov that there is an enormous difference between &quot;random&quot; and &quot;arbitrary&quot;. 

The fact remains this was a poor article that provides little but anecdotal stories and serves no purpose but to provide drivers with some justification for acting out. 

When the next car runs down a bike, what role will he think this article played?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone should point out to David Filipov that there is an enormous difference between &#8220;random&#8221; and &#8220;arbitrary&#8221;. </p>
<p>The fact remains this was a poor article that provides little but anecdotal stories and serves no purpose but to provide drivers with some justification for acting out. </p>
<p>When the next car runs down a bike, what role will he think this article played?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://bostonbiker.org/2009/08/10/david-filipov-of-the-boston-globe-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonbiker.org/?p=1194#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>1st article points out that biking is dangerous in Boston ---&gt; Drivers get pissed ---&gt; 2nd article demonizes bikers because drivers are pissed ---&gt; Bikers get pissed ---&gt; 3rd article demonizes pedestrians because bikers are pissed

Why not just write one good article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1st article points out that biking is dangerous in Boston &#8212;&gt; Drivers get pissed &#8212;&gt; 2nd article demonizes bikers because drivers are pissed &#8212;&gt; Bikers get pissed &#8212;&gt; 3rd article demonizes pedestrians because bikers are pissed</p>
<p>Why not just write one good article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
